Blog Post

Arbitrators’ Powers: Expansive, but Open to Challenge if Exceeded

An edited version of the following article appeared in the January 2013 edition of the King County Bar Bulletin.  P.E.C. Arbitrators’ Powers:  Expansive, but Open to Challenge if Exceeded By Phil Cutler © 2012  Like judges, arbitrators have broad powers when managing and deciding cases.  But their powers are limited by the agreement to arbitrate from which those powers are…

Continue reading

Doing Business in Washington? Understand the ADR Options.

ADR IN WASHINGTON – Chapter 28 of “Doing Business in Washington” (5th ed., WSBA International Section) I was asked to author the chapter on Alternative Dispute Resolution for the 5th edition of “Doing Business in Washington”, published (fall 2010) by the WSBA International Section in conjunction with the Washington Department of Commerce.  I also authored the same chapter in prior…

Continue reading

Arbitration – Getting the Evidence, Getting it in . . . and Persuading the Arbitrator

ARBITRATION PRACTICE & PROCEDURE The following material was prepared for an in-house law firm CLE in the fall of 2008. While arbitrations and court cases share many common traits, an arbitration is generally less formal procedurally than a court case, the discovery available in arbitration is a good deal less expansive than that available in litigation, and the decision-maker is…

Continue reading

Realizing the Benefits of Arbitration – Top 10 Tips to CEOs and CFOs

In the fall of 2009 the College of Commercial Arbitrators, a by-invitation only association of leading domestic and international arbitrators, in conjunction with the American Arbitration Association and other major arbitration-provider organizations, hosted a summit of leading lawyers, arbitrators, business executives, and general counsel to discuss ways in which arbitration – long viewed among businesses as the preferred domestic and…

Continue reading

Trial Date Bumped? Brokered Out? Consider Arbitrating Your Case

By Phil Cutler Cutler Nylander & Hayton PS 1191 Second Avenue Seattle, WA  98101 philcutler@cnhlaw.com 206-340-4600 Philip E. Cutler © 2011     It has undoubtedly happened to you.  It is the week before trial.  You are in the final throes of case preparation.  You are feeling good about the case and your preparation.  You are looking forward to trial,…

Continue reading

Copyright for Architectural Works

Copyright for Architectural Works by Thomas Hayton © 1993-2010 Thomas Hayton. All rights reserved. 1.  Introduction; Nature of Protections 1.1. Copyright 1.2. Moral Rights 1.3. Purpose of This Paper 2. Who Owns the Protection and How Do They Keep It? 2.1. Who is the Author? 2.2. Registration 2.3. Notice of Claim to Copyright 2.4. Transfer, Expiration, or Loss of Copyright…

Continue reading

Intricacies of Dispute Resolution Clauses Within International Business Agreements-Key Drafting Considerations

  INTRICACIES OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSES WITHIN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AGREEMENTS – KEY DRAFTING CONSIDERATIONS by Philip E. Cutler Cutler Nylander & Hayton, P.S. 1191 Second Avenue , Suite 1650 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 340-4600 Facsimile: (206) 340-4646 © 2010, Philip E. Cutler Phil Cutler is a principal in the Seattle law firm Cutler Nylander & Hayton, P.S., where his…

Continue reading

Reclaiming the Promise of Arbitration

By Phil Cutler[1]

From the earliest days of the Washington Territory, arbitration has been a recognized method of dispute resolution in our state;[2] the Legislature enacted Washington’s first arbitration act in 1869.[3] Historically, arbitration has been popular, especially among businesses; notwithstanding its higher forum costs (the parties pay not insignificant filing fees and bear the cost of compensating the arbitrator), it offered parties a number of benefits not available in a litigation forum:  the opportunity to select the decision-maker, usually someone experienced in resolving business disputes; confidentiality; an early opportunity for a hearing on the merits; and a final award, not subject to interminable appeals.  Moreover, arbitration was a more expeditious and less expensive alternative to litigation, largely because “discovery” and motions practice in arbitration were limited and parties had no need for significant case preparation time.

Continue reading

Scroll to top